Prevalence
Duval's highest prevalence band contains six tracts.
"Prevalence" is the share of homes in an area that are probable heirs' properties. Grouping tracts into bands, from low to high prevalence, shows where that share is concentrated.
Those tracts have a median heirs' property prevalence of 21.29% in the current 221-tract analysis.
5.0–9.9% band
7.98% median
Highest band
21.29% median
A small number of tracts can carry far higher concentration than the countywide figure suggests, and lower median income and property value follow those same tracts.
Keep in mind: the four bands are practical reporting groups, not universal thresholds.
Unresolved Estates
Unresolved-estate rates vary sharply across income quintiles.
An "unresolved estate" is a home where a prior owner appears deceased and the property has not passed into a current, stable form of ownership. A tract's rate of unresolved estates reflects both how many estates are unresolved and how local probate filing is handled.
In Camden's tract analysis, the rate was 27.6 per 1,000 in the lowest-income quintile, compared with 0.4 per 1,000 in the highest.
Affordable probate and title-clearing capacity may be hardest to find exactly where the need is most concentrated.
Keep in mind: this is a tract-level association, not a finding about an individual family, and a low rate can also reflect a county's filing approach rather than fewer unresolved estates.
Continuity and Unresolved Estates
Long residential continuity can coincide with greater unresolved-estate need.
"High continuity" means the top fourth of tracts in each county for the share of households in the same home for at least 25 years. "Lower resources" means both household income and owner-reported property value at or below 0.9 times the county median; "higher resources" means both above 1.2 times.
In high-continuity tracts, screened unresolved-estate prevalence was higher where both household income and owner-reported property value were lower relative to each county's median.
Lower resources
Higher resources
Harris County, TX3.9× higher
Duval County, FL8.1× higher
Camden County, NJ11.4× higher
Screened unresolved estates as a share of eligible residential parcels in high-continuity tracts. Source: Project Guardian cross-county continuity and resources review, 11 September 2026; 2020–2024 ACS context.
Keep in mind: These are tract-level associations, not findings about individual families or evidence of cause. County records and screening methods differ.
Legacy Neighborhoods
How history and present conditions shape a neighborhood
Project Guardian compares historical housing policy with current ownership, housing conditions, and community assets.
This helps explain what has endured, what has changed, and which resources can support families today.
A legacy-neighborhood profile connects historical patterns with present ownership conditions and identifies where legal services, preventive planning, stabilization, or further local research may be useful.
Keep in mind: Local participation is essential for defining the neighborhood, interpreting its history, and identifying appropriate action.
Scale
One state can contain hundreds of different local questions.
The same analysis, run consistently statewide, still needs a locality-by-locality summary: what looks similar at the state level often plays out differently on the ground.
Virginia is one example. Project Guardian analyzed all 133 counties and independent cities, revealing substantial differences in probable heirs' property prevalence and ownership conditions from one community to another.
Statewide processing provides consistent first-pass evidence while county summaries preserve local differences.
Keep in mind: Review county records to validate findings before conducting operational outreach.
Food Access
A store-distance map can miss community food distribution.
Most food-access models measure distance to grocery stores alone. Ours also counts fixed community pantries, since many families rely on both.
In the Duval Food (in)Security (F(i)S) model, 28 block groups lacked qualifying retail access. Fixed pantries changed 21 of them to partial access.
A food-access model changes when it includes operating distribution sites, not just retail stores.
Keep in mind: Mapping all SNAP retailers vs. only those who provide quality food options results in very different access findings.